Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

The Miranda Rights


# 104480
The Miranda Rights
Looks at the case of "Miranda v. Arizona" that established the now famous, Miranda warning.
1,780 words (approx. 7.1 pages) | 6 sources | APA | 2006 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper explains that, in "Miranda v. Arizona" (1966), laid down by the Warren Supreme Court, to secure a criminal suspect's Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, the police must advise suspects in custody, before any questioning takes place, of their right to remain silent. The paper also relates the advantages and disadvantages of the Miranda Rights in the areas of custody, mandated warnings, interrogation rights and admissibility of evidence. The paper concludes that the 'Miranda Decision' clearly accomplished its goal by creating a Fifth Amendment right to counsel that is distinct from but closely related to the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

Table of Contents:
Introduction
Overview of the Miranda Decision
The Pros and Cons of the Miranda Rights
Custody
Mandated Warnings
Interrogation Rights
Exceptions and Limitations
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"Thus, the rights of the suspect to appointed counsel, the right to silence and the right to non--incrimination are obviously in favor of the suspect. Generally speaking, a suspect does not understand nor is he/she familiar with the methodology involved in an
attorney's actions in court, but with the presence of an attorney, a suspect will be warned what not to say to the police.
"When a suspect remains silent during interrogations, it can be an indication of guilt which further protects the criminal."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Ashworth, Andrew. (1999). Principles of Criminal Law. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.
  • Day, Frank D. (1964). Criminal Law and Society. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Dix, George e. (1973). Criminal Law: Cases and Materials. New York: West Publications.
  • Gay, Peter B. and Richard H. Prunier. (1967). The Policeman and the Accused: Search and Seizure and Rights of the Accused. MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gold, Susan D. (1995). Miranda v. Arizona: Suspect's Rights. New York: Henry Holt & Company.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

The Miranda Rights (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 11, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-The-Miranda-Rights/104480

MLA Citation:

"The Miranda Rights" 15 January 2012. Web. 11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-The-Miranda-Rights/104480>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 34.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Mgmleo US
Publisher Since:
May 02, 2001
BA in English and American literature, University of Michigan; Life member of the Edgar Allan Poe Society of Baltimore; PUBLISHING CREDENTIALS: The Atlantic Literary Review (2002); First Knight, Journal of the Irving Society (2002); Kakatiya Journal of English Studies (2002); Monsterzine (2001); Edgar Allan Poe Review (1998); editor for "In All Sincerity. . . Peter Cushing" by Christopher Gullo (2004); lecturer at the 2001 Edgar Allan Poe Conference. Presently at work on "The Theatrical Ancestry of Sir Peter Cushing" and a similar article for Scarlet Street magazine. Published author w/ Bear Manor Media--Lee Van Cleef: Best of the Bad, The Unknown Peter Cushing
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success