Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

The "Challenger" Launch Decision


The "Challenger" Launch Decision
This paper evaluates, by reviewing individual journal articles, the correctness of Joe Kilminster's decision to launch the "Challenger" space ship on its mission, which ended in disaster.
2,745 words (approx. 11 pages) | 6 sources | APA | 2004 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper explains that NASA managers were informed, adequately and promptly, about the unsuitability of the approved design of shuttle rocket boosters when used under temperatures below 40 F per the contract signed with Morton-Thiokol; but NASA authorities were subject to severe economic and political pressures and schedule backlogs. The author states that, instead of upholding his superior's decision, his fellow professionals' technical findings and recommendations, and observing his profession's code of ethics, Joe Kilminster subjected himself to the pressure of NASA and recommended the launch, despite the negative input of his engineers. The paper concludes that Kilminster is morally accountable and culpable for the disaster, directly risking the lives of seven persons by ignoring his own knowledge as an expert engineer and the strong recommendations of his subordinate professionals

Table of Contents
Introduction
Review of Literature
M. M. Jennings, "Summary of the Challenger Episode"
Gordon Stubley, "Engineer and Integrity"
Diane Vaughan, "The Challenger Launch Decision"
National Society of Professional Engineers, "Code of Ethics for Engineers"
Texas A & M University, Departments of Philosophy and of Mechanical Engineering, "The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster"
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations

From the Paper:

"Joe Kilminster, an engineer, and the Vice President or Space Booster Programs at Thiokol, was one of four management signatories who approved the launch and the author of the written recommendation that it was all right for the shuttle to fly. Thiokol's contract with the NASA provided that shuttles with boosters, like the Challenger, would function properly only within the range of 40 to 90 F. Its engineers also formalized their objection to such launch the day before the disaster."

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

The "Challenger" Launch Decision (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-The-Challenger-Launch-Decision/57074

MLA Citation:

"The "Challenger" Launch Decision" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-The-Challenger-Launch-Decision/57074>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 49.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Calwriter US
Publisher Since:
Nov 28, 2004
We've been publishing our papers on AcaDemon for several years now and have a very high satisfaction rate with our customers. Our writers invest a great deal of time and effort in researching and writing all of their papers and their professionalism as writers is reflected in those papers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success