Socrates: Can Harm Come to a Good Person?

Paper Summary:

This essay concerns the Greek philosopher Socrates and his definition of a good person. The author presents the argument that Socrates? definition is solid, but his defense is flawed. The author supports his argument with examples from Socrates' "The Apology".

From the Paper:

"The Greek Philosopher Socrates claimed that no harm or evil can come to a good person. He argued this stance first of all by defining the characteristics of a good person. He believed in five basic traits of virtue that a person must exemplify in order to be good: justice, courage, temperance, piety, and wisdom. Of these five, all are centered on wisdom; that is, each trait must be understood somehow through wisdom (ECP 506). For example, Socrates lived to a relatively ripe age of around seventy years, and, by the time of his death, had gained a certain level of wisdom that taught him the importance of piety, temperance, courage, and justice. Thus, by gaining wisdom because he lived so long, he was able to relate the importance of the afore-mentioned traits. Overall, Socrates defines a good person as having virtue, wisdom or knowledge, and a certain goodness (or improvement) of the soul."

More papers on Socrates: Can Harm Come to a Good Person?:

• Term Paper # 127731 : "Good and Evil in "A Good Man is Hard to Find"
• Essay # 73738 : "A Good Man Is Hard to Find"
• Analytical Essay # 71284 : "A Good Man is Hard to Find"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: