Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Self and Other in "Antony and Cleopatra"


# 113573
Self and Other in "Antony and Cleopatra"
An examination of the binary nature of William Shakespeare's play, "Antony and Cleopatra," and how it generates multiple layers of meaning.
2,699 words (approx. 10.8 pages) | 7 sources | MLA | 2009 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper illustrates how, in Shakespeare's "Antony and Cleopatra", a climax is reached within the ancient Greek themes of creation and destruction that mirrors the distinctions between love and war, and the explicit and implicit communication of love to oneself and another, seen in the play's rendition of male and female love. The writer argues that "Antony and Cleopatra" offers a Christian-mystic-community-pagan parallelism centered around more ancient themes, and that, in the play, fate is in constant countermotion with freedom, which tragically can lead to neurosis, or positively to a romantically balanced catharsis. The writer contrasts the emotive content of the play with its cognitive content, the blurring and refocusing of which create the play's subjective ethical implications.

Outline:
Abstract
Introduction
The Contrast between What is and What Could be: Antony's Neurosis
Contrast Between the Written and Spoken Word
Intertextual Interpretations and Influences
The Intertextuality in Antony and Cleopatra: Hercules and Masochism
Hercules as Christian/Pagan Intertext
The Egyptian Other and the Roman Self

From the Paper:

"One priority in discussing things as complex as works of art, especially plays, is to acknowledge certain presuppositions about the nature of the subject matter. Is the philosophy of literature the same as literature that contains philosophy? While this has been widely debated, I think the issue lies in the distinction between the two, which if blurry, expresses an overlap such that literature can serve as philosophy, somewhat in the way that later Heidegger believed that poetry was the highest form of philosophical thinking."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Andrews, John F. "Antony and Cleopatra Theater Notes". The Plays. Shakespeare Theater Company. (1988).
  • Deats, Sara Munson. Antony and Cleopatra: New Critical Essays. Routledge, (2005).
  • Berry, Philippa. ""Forgetting Egypt: oblivion and anamnesis in Antony and Cleopatra" King's College, Cambridge. Retrieved on December 10th, 2008 from <http://iris.univ-paris3.fr/Communications/Berry-AC-Forgetting.html>
  • Dureau, Yona. Complex Systems in Renaissance and Postmodern texts: Aesthetic and Epistemological Consequences Semiotica. Issue 171, Pages 311-341 ( 2008).
  • Haberer, Adolphe. "Intertextuality in Theory and Practice". Literature, issue: 49(5) pgs 54-67. (2007).

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Self and Other in "Antony and Cleopatra" (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-Self-and-Other-in-Antony-and-Cleopatra/113573

MLA Citation:

"Self and Other in "Antony and Cleopatra"" 15 January 2012. Web. 10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-Self-and-Other-in-Antony-and-Cleopatra/113573>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 48.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

adverbialx US
Publisher Since:
Feb 26, 2008
B.A. from a great institution with heavy experience in political science, sociology, philosophy, psychology and the rest of the humanities. Some graduate work in political science, cognitive science, and anthropology.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success