This paper examines the concept of plea bargaining which involves a criminal case in which the defense and prosecution negotiate and compromise a type of arrangement in relation to a defendant's guilt and sentencing. In exchange for a guilty or no contest plea, the prosecution will request a reduction in the charges or sentence that a criminal would otherwise receive. It addresses the costs and benefits of plea bargaining, such as the advantages to the court system, judges and especially defendants. Furthermore, it discusses the pros and cons to all parties involved, including the victims. Lastly, the paper analyzes how plea bargaining could possibly be reformed and the necessity of making it more visible and understandable to society.
From the Paper:
"Another benefit to some defendants in regard to plea bargaining is the opportunity to be released from jail. Some criminals that would not be released otherwise are released instantly following the negotiation and approval of a plea bargain. It also gives the defendant the advantage of having the matter resolved quickly and having a less severe offense placed on their record. Offenses on one's record can weigh greatly on an individual. Felonies can be very harmful when applying for a job or avoiding some states' "three strikes" rule. Some states even require that professional licenses be revoked upon a felony conviction. Also, a felony conviction can result in the loss of the right to vote and possess firearms."