NAPHHS and American Healthcare

Paper Summary:

The paper provides an analysis and discussion concerning the position that the National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems (NAPHHS) has taken on the policy issue/problem of uninsured healthcare consumers in the United States. The paper examines the rationale the group has given for its position and discusses why the group should and should not take this position. The paper concludes that while there are serious problems facing the NAPHHS today, the United States can ill afford to ignore the healthcare needs of millions of Americans. In addition, the paper asserts that healthcare delayed simply means higher costs later on and a diminishment of the ability of workers to continue their employment in the future.

Outline:
The Issue/Problem
The Group's Position
The Rationale the Group has Given for its Position, the Evidence or Other Support for its Position, What Accounts for the Group's Approach to the Issue
An Evaluation of the Group's Position. Why the Group Should Take on this Position, Why the Group Should Not Take This Position

From the Paper:

"Today, the National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems (NAPHSS) provides more than $6 billion in unreimbursed healthcare services to healthcare consumers in the United States and operates a number of emergency rooms and ambulatory care facilities that represent the only access to healthcare for many people. Together with the Department of Veterans Affairs, the NAPHSS is also responsible for training many of the healthcare practitioners that go on to make substantive contributions to the nation's healthcare system. Clearly, the NAPHSS represents an important component of the nation's healthcare system, but the manner in which these hospitals are funded and the amounts they receive make the problem of continuing to provide care for millions of uninsured Americans especially challenging."

Sample of Sources Used:

• Altman, S. H., Reinhardt, U. E. & Shactman, D. (1999). Regulating managed care: Theory, practice, and future options. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Bloche, M. G. (2003). The privatization of health care reform: Legal and regulatory perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Davidson, B. (1997, April). Keeping welfare reform healthy. State Legislatures, 23(4), 10-11.
• Kovner, A. R. & Knickman, J. R. (2005). Jonas and Kovner's health care delivery in the United States. New York: Springer.
• Public hospitals and health systems: A responsible investment. (2008). The National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems. [Online]. Available: http://www.naph.org/naph/ PolicyPriorities/Workforce/ResponsibleInvestment.pdf.

More papers on NAPHHS and American Healthcare:

• Term Paper # 108925 : "American Healthcare and the American Government"
• Comparison Essay # 54123 : "British and American Health Care Systems"
• Argumentative Essay # 134467 : "Impact of Illegal Immigrants on American Healthcare"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: