The paper explains how Plato introduces the concept of psychic justice, that contradicts the popular notion that the wicked and unjust reap the fruits of the world, while the just are easy prey for the evildoers. The paper examines Socrates' arguments in Plato's "Republic" and posits that all the objections raised by the friends and acquaintances of Socrates are answered comprehensively.
From the Paper:
"Plato's Republic presents the concepts of psychic justice and psychic virtue. This is different from what is normally observed as justice and virtue. Thus, when apparently good deeds are ostensibly rewarded, and, correspondingly, evils deeds are punished, that is considered to be justice. But Plato is suggesting that appearances are deceptive, and that true justice and virtue are not so easily recognizable. The matter needs to be considered by essences, not appearances. In this way is derived psychic justice and virtue. And when we arrive at the latter understanding we overcome the contradictions found in the first view. For in the apparent view evil seems to be rewarded, while virtue is punished, in the normal course of life. The object of Plato is thus to convince that the just life is preferable to the unjust."
Sample of Sources Used:
Plato. Plato's The Republic. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. New York: The Modern library, 1941.
Justice in Plato's "Republic" (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-Justice-in-Plato's-Republic/116449