Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document
Why AcaDemon? Find Your Paper Improve Your Paper Publish Your Papers for Resale Custom papers


Interpretation in Archaeology

# 146417
Looks at post-processualism as a preferred approach to interpretation in the field of archaeology.
2,465 words (approx. 9.9 pages) | 9 sources | APA | 2010 | United States
Published on: Dec 26, 2010

Paper Summary:

This paper explains that the post-processualist paradigm of archaeology, which started during the 1980s, accepts a variety paradigms of interpretation plus different sociological paradigms of past investigations. The elements of post-processualist movement in archaeology, the author relates, are symbolism, material culture and hermeneutics. The paper reviews the problems of past theories of interpretation and concludes that post-processualism is the most useful paradigm because it does recognize past work.

From the Paper:

"The Church, on the other hand, promoted the belief of the "natural" order of feudalism. This belief was also applied to the material representations of the spiritual world. As such, heavenly hierarchies were represented in the social relationships of the time, and also in artifacts and physical structures such as Stonehenge.
"The "us and them" concept can then be applied to the differentiated classes of medieval times. Those who worshiped the stones were seen as "the other" by the higher classes. They were the common people, used for labor, and regarded as the lowest in the natural hierarchy of feudalism."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Bender, B. 1989. The Roots of Inequality. In D. Miller, M. Rowlands and C. Tilley (eds.), Domination and Resistance. London: Unwin Hyman, 83-95.
  • Bender, B. 1998. Stonehenge: Making Space. Oxford: Berg.
  • Gamble, C. 2001. Chapter 2: How Many Archaeologies Are There? In Archaeology: The Basics. London and New York: Routledge, 21-44.
  • Gero, J. 1994. Gender Division of Labour in the Construction of Archaeological Knowledge in the United States. In G.C. Bond and A. Gilliam (eds.), Social Construction of the Past. London and New York: Routledge, 144-153.
  • Hodder, I. 1998. The Past as Passion and Play: Catal Hoyuk as a Site of Conflict in the Construction of Multiple Pasts. In L. Meskell (ed.), Archaeology under Fire. London: Routledge, 124-139

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Interpretation in Archaeology (2012, April 01). Retrieved May 21, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-Interpretation-in-Archaeology/146417

MLA Citation:

"Interpretation in Archaeology" 01 April 2012. Web. 21 May. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-Interpretation-in-Archaeology/146417>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 49.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Nicky US
Publisher Since:
May 25, 2010
Writers at our company all have university degrees, a vast amount of professional writing experience, and are excellent researchers. We've been publishing our papers on AcaDemon for over seven years and our customers have always been satisfied with our work.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success
Social
Google Plus Page YouTube Channel Podcasts on iTunes