Democracy and the Libertarian Ideal of Self-Ownership

Paper Summary:

This paper looks at the notion of western democracy, and how by its very definition, impinges on our everyday lives. The author defines democracy, and looks at what democracy was intended to be, and how, as government expanded, and its influence expanded that democracy has had the opposite affect, and is not limiting our freedoms. The author also suggest ways in which we can regain the benefits that democracy was designed to provide.

From the Paper:

"Indeed, if we did otherwise, we would be treating people not as full members of the community among equals, but as sheep unto a shepherd, or a child unto a parent. While such relationships are certainly appropriate between the incompetent and the competent, they can hardly be countenanced for the competent, who are entitled to their own private sphere in which they can determine the meaning of their experiences and define their own ends. After all, since people are different, and even individuals change through time, no one can better know his own conception of the good and his unique set of ends better than the individual himself. The state, far removed from the individual, is in no position to make that determination, and therefore, must be neutral to conceptions of the good. The state's disallowing one to choose for himself the sort of life he leads is, in fact, a principal criterion by which we can judge its goodness."

More papers on Democracy and the Libertarian Ideal of Self-Ownership:

• Argumentative Essay # 118780 : "Democracy and the Free Market"
• Argumentative Essay # 4645 : "Libertarian Self-Ownership: Touchstone of Justice"
• Book Review # 147498 : "The Drowned and the Saved": Analysis of the "Gray Zone"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: